pageok
pageok
pageok
Wall Street Journal on the Comprehensive Drug Testing Case:
The Wall Street Journal has a helpful story on the Ninth Circuit's Comprehensive Drug Testing case that rewote the rules for computer search and seizure. I've blogged in detail about the case, but the WSJ story offers a nice introduction to the issue.

UPDATE: It seems that to get around the subscriber wall, you need to go here and click on the first link. Thanks to How Appealing for the tip.
ruuffles (mail) (www):
Speaking of 9th circuit en bancs, today is the en banc of Nordyke, with these judges on the panel:

KOZINSKI, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, O'SCANNLAIN,
RYMER, HAWKINS, GRABER, GOULD, TALLMAN, M SMITH,
IKUTA, CJJ
9.24.2009 9:06am
Sara:
Any of those also on the three judge panel?
9.24.2009 9:59am
Uh_Clem (mail):
Neither link provides the full article to this non-subscriber.
9.24.2009 10:11am
Uh_Clem (mail):
Belay that. Third try is the charm...
9.24.2009 10:15am
Kent Scheidegger (mail) (www):
Having O'Scannlain and Reinhardt on the same panel is generally good for boosting the entertainment value of the resulting opinions.

The preceding plural is intentional. There will be more than one.
9.24.2009 12:33pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?

If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.

Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.

We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.

And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.