pageok
pageok
pageok
CQ's Legal Beat:

Congressional Quarterly (aka CQ) has a new blog focusing Congress and the courts, "Legal Beat." Among its initial posts are one on Senator Specter's call for "bipartisanship" in judicial nominations and another on Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Senator Leahy and "Blue Slips."

Just an Observer:
The Leahy item was tantalizing, if inconclusive, and I think the Specter item was news when the handout was published. But this one dated today (Feb. 4)?

The most telling evidence so far that President Obama will abandon some of George W. Bush's more audacious claims of presidential authority wasn't Obama's ballyhooed Jan. 22 executive order closing the Guantanamo Bay detainee prison. It was the little-noticed appointment of Georgetown Law professor Neal Katyal as Principal Deputy Solicitor General at the Justice Department.


Little noticed? Huh?

Perhaps I am being picky, and I wish CQ well with this new vehicle. Even more, I wish it well in finding a new corporate parent with a benign management and a strong balance sheet.
2.5.2009 12:05am
Larry Fafarman (mail) (www):
The "blue slip" policy is stupid -- why should Senators have a veto over judicial nominees from their states. And some judicial nominees move from state to state -- they are not residents of particular states.
2.5.2009 3:54pm

Post as: [Register] [Log In]

Account:
Password:
Remember info?

If you have a comment about spelling, typos, or format errors, please e-mail the poster directly rather than posting a comment.

Comment Policy: We reserve the right to edit or delete comments, and in extreme cases to ban commenters, at our discretion. Comments must be relevant and civil (and, especially, free of name-calling). We think of comment threads like dinner parties at our homes. If you make the party unpleasant for us or for others, we'd rather you went elsewhere. We're happy to see a wide range of viewpoints, but we want all of them to be expressed as politely as possible.

We realize that such a comment policy can never be evenly enforced, because we can't possibly monitor every comment equally well. Hundreds of comments are posted every day here, and we don't read them all. Those we read, we read with different degrees of attention, and in different moods. We try to be fair, but we make no promises.

And remember, it's a big Internet. If you think we were mistaken in removing your post (or, in extreme cases, in removing you) -- or if you prefer a more free-for-all approach -- there are surely plenty of ways you can still get your views out.