This will get interesting.
Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population by:
* creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization;
satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation;
* augmenting primitive feelings of envy;
* rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government.
It's only when you try to impose your ideological beliefs on others that you step into the realm of the psychologically disordered.
I'm not surprised that conservative bloggers and commenters don't really understand the differences between Obama and Hillary.
Why are we talking about Rossiter? Plenty of "experts" tell us that right-wingers are deranged or have a low IQ. I think all these studies, left or right, can and should be trashed.
I couldn't agree more. Of course, when I do it, it's a patriotic call to common sense.
Nader is simply a publicity hound who knows that he hasn't got a shot in hell of winning, he runs just for self-agrandizement, and the consequences be damned. I have to admit that, as someone who thinks a win by either Clinton or Obama would be bad for the country, I'm grateful for whatever minimal damage Nader might do to the Democratic nominee, but I'm frankly a bit embarrassed by the unseemly spectacle of Nader running again.
Liberals believe that what goes on between consenting adults in the privacy of their bedrooms is their business, not the government's.
It would be interesting to show the public a detailed film of how cattle, poultry, and pigs meet their end. I wonder what the reaction would be?