The Volokh Conspiracy

Lesson #1 About the Law -- What You Did Was Against It;

Title #2 — "Ayn Rand Would Not Have Approved": PhillyBurbs.com reports:

An aspiring attorney is in trouble with the law, accused of trying to cheat his way into a better law school.

Kevin Siangchin, 30, of North Plainfield, N.J., was arrested Thursday and charged with trying to bribe an employee of the Law School Admissions Council in Newtown Township to sell him an advance copy of the Law School Admission Test for $5,000.

Siangchin allegedly took the standardized test, which is required to get into law school, twice before and wanted to take it again to improve his score....

Siangchin, an engineer, used the name John Galt on the e-mail [to an LSAC employee whom he was trying to persuade to leak him a copy of the test]. John Galt is a character in the Ayn Rand novel “Atlas Shrugged” ....

According to police, Siangchin told detectives [who eventually arrested him] that he knew he was doing something wrong but that he “really wanted a good score.” ...

After his arrest, Siangchin asked detectives for his money back, police reports said....

The story also reports that "Siangchin is charged with potential to change the world," but I'm pretty sure that this is because a block of text was inadvertently repeated. (By the time you read this, the glitch might have been fixed.)

Thanks to Sebastian (Snowflakes In Hell) for the pointer.

Kovarsky (mail):
who is john galt?
2.9.2007 5:28pm
A Northwestern Law Student:
"[Defendant] is charged with potential to change the world." So many undertones; I love it!
2.9.2007 5:33pm
Fearmonger (mail):
Wow, the story really does report that "Siangchin is charged with potential to change the world." I thought that was just a joke, EV.

Sounds like a pretty serious charge too since the story also reports that Siangchin could face 7 yrs in the slammer.
2.9.2007 5:34pm
Kovarsky (mail):
just to be clear, that was a joke about the annoying frequency of the question in atlas shrugged, not a failure to read the post.
2.9.2007 5:49pm
Ex-Fed (mail):
LSAT is LSAT!

The guy sounds a little unclear on basic Randian premises, though: "Police said Siangchin added that with 120,000 people across the country taking the exam, 'putting himself ahead in such a large group would make no difference.'"

But can you imagine being the cop who had to put John Galt in the box and interview him? You'd ask him what happened, and three hundred pages later they'd have to take you out on a stretcher, writing hand cramped into a claw.
2.9.2007 5:51pm
Fearmonger (mail):
$5k seems a little on the low side for an advance copy of the LSAT. Perhaps if he had bid higher his contact would not have turned him over to the authorities.
2.9.2007 5:56pm
arbitraryaardvark (mail) (www):
[Galt] is charged with attempted theft, criminal solicitation, criminal use of a communication device, and unlawful use of a computer. and attempting to change the world. This would make an interesting crim law exam hypo.
Is he guilty of attempted theft? Or just attempted receipt of stolen goods? Solicitation I'll conceed, which opens the door to the communication device and computer charges. Are those separate charges, is there a double jeopardy problem, alex?

Siangchin, an engineer, used the name John Galt on the e-mail. John Galt is a character in the Ayn Rand novel “Atlas Shrugged,” about an engineer who designed a revolutionary new motor powered by ambient static electricity with the potential to change the world.

I know Howard Roark is loosely based on Frank Lloyd Wright.
Is Galt based on Tesla?
2.9.2007 6:24pm
FatOllie:
Kovarsky, it was a very good joke. Anybody who has tried to read "Atlas" would get it right away and most would find it funny. Peikoff, probably not, but any normal reader would.
2.9.2007 6:27pm
FatOllie:
"I know Howard Roark is loosely based on Frank Lloyd Wright.
Is Galt based on Tesla?"

More likely a character created by Mary Shelley, the major difference being that Shelley's character was more believable.
2.9.2007 6:33pm
Tareeq (www):
Is Galt based on Tesla

Not quite. He's a loose hybrid of Edison and Fabio. By objectivist lights Atlas Shrugged is Ayn Rand's bodice-ripper.
2.9.2007 7:23pm
Viscus (mail) (www):
Anyone have an opinion on what an appropriate punishment should be? Obviously, the guy is not going to get 7 years.
2.9.2007 7:26pm
Fearmonger (mail):
Anyone have an opinion on what an appropriate punishment should be? Obviously, the guy is not going to get 7 years.

Upon a brief lexis search, I could not find much sentencing precedent for those convicted of "potential to change the world," but it sounds like an unconstitutional status crime to me.
2.9.2007 8:09pm
Chimaxx (mail):
Sounds like he was more inspired by a different text.

This was his third attempt, right? Did he perhaps see this as his Kobayashi Maru, and expect a commendation for original thinking?
2.9.2007 9:51pm
Chris 24601 (mail):
Fearmonger made my joke before I could get a chance to--sounds like a Robinson v. California issue to me!
2.9.2007 10:15pm
Charles Thomas (mail) (www):
Anyone have an opinion on what an appropriate punishment should be? Obviously, the guy is not going to get 7 years.

He'll get probation for a couple years, probably a higher than usual fine, and a lifetime of humiliation. On the bright side, he will never have to find out how crappy it is to be a lawyer most days.
2.10.2007 8:37am
Spartacus (www):
Kovarsky, it was a very good joke. Anybody who has tried to read "Atlas" would get it right away and most would find it funny. Peikoff, probably not, but any normal reader would.

I got the joke, and not only did I try to read AS, but I finished, and enjoyed it.
2.10.2007 3:22pm
Brian G (mail) (www):
Let's not kid anyone. All of us had one time or another secretly wished we could arrange an advance copy, although I thinkwe would not be as idiotic as this guy.

As a side note, I think an advance copy would be worth, at least on the black market, at least $100K, minimum. If I had gotten a few more points, I would have gotten into Yale or Harvard. And we all know the salary differences between those schools is substantial enough to justify paying that mych for an advance copy.
2.10.2007 10:13pm
R. Nebblesworth:
For $100k, or even "only" $5k, couldn't you get enough training and tutoring to blow the LSAT away without cheating?
2.11.2007 1:24pm
Brian G (mail) (www):
Yes, you could. I did well by studying and busting hump. I still think that it is a tempting proposition, nonetheless.
2.11.2007 8:26pm
Houston Lawyer:
What you'd want is the key to the test. Clearly he is not bright enough for law school.
2.12.2007 11:37am