Related Posts (on one page):
- Jon Stewart on the Minuteman Protest at Columbia:
- Columbia Responds:
- Thugs Block Free Speech at Columbia University:
Jon Stewart on the Minuteman Protest at Columbia:
The excerpt from the Daily Show is here.
Related Posts (on one page):
|
ContactSubscribeFeaturesStuff from usAcademic Legal Writing: personalized bookplates Sources on the Second Amendment BlogrollArchivesThe Volokh Conspiracy uses and recommends: |
Shorter Columbia protesters: "We tried our best, you know the rest"
Hasn't Jon Stewart said as much himself, and pretty explicitly? I forget the context, but I remember him pointing out that satire is only satisfying when it's aimed at the powerful.
When the Democrats become a party that actually controls one of the legislatures or the presidency in Washingtion, I am sure the Daily Show will be mocking them too.
Will the Republican sue for patent infringement or appropriation of trade secrets?
Yes, he exists, frightening though he may occasionally be. I Like him though anyway, he's funny.
He strikes at the democrats a lot now.
"They attacked us."
"We didn't shut them down, they shut themselves down."
I guess these kids view "1984" as a "how-to" book.
I doubt it. It’s hard to believe anyone could be that stupid. He’s some actor the Republicans hired to make the liberals look silly.
A fair bet considering many of the jokes against Republicans are that they sell out their conservative values. Hypocrisy is highly mockable.
The "far left"? Maoists? Marxist-Leninists? Sans-culottes? Somehow I doubt their commitment to or interest in "liberal values."
I am disappointed that the columbia audience couldn't create a contrast, but when you go to a diverse area proud of its many ethnicities and spout blatantly racist beliefs, it is not out of the quesiton that you would be in a sticky situation. People tend to take those sorts of opinions very personally. It's sad but true.
We're all for free speech but no one honestly expects the KKK will ever be able to exercise that right in S Central LA without police protection. that's just human nature, unfortunately, no matter how "big" all us intellectuals are. I wuold also note, no one here seems to be defending the minutemen's views--they beef isnt with "illegal" immigration, they believe these brown people are ruining the whiteness that made America great (see Buchanan's book).
I seem to remember a hypothetical in torts class where a jewish man or black man might have a defense against a battery charge induced by a especially vicious racial provocation. I am not defending such violence and the kids at columbia made a stupid decision and have no such defense. My point is that everyone--conservatives and liberals tend to react violently, even physically violently--to strong provocations that cut to their very self-identity (ethnicity, anti-communism). Academics, professors, and intellectuals tend not to have those violent reactions and do not fully understand them in others.
Strange that you couldn't actually point to a real event that proves your point about conservatives. You mention Mississippi Burning? Can't you get a little closer than the 1960s? And then to compare this minuteman to the KKK spouting hatred in LA? Let's get real.
Oh and what exactly were the "blatantly racists beliefs" this guy was spouting in public?
You are correct. People on the Right might very well behave in the same way. However, they would probably not engage in the same amount of doublethink to justify their actions.
You say a number of true things, but what's your point?
Sure, people aren't discussing the minutemen's message while also discussing violent assault by the Columbia protestors. The Columbia Protestors orchestrated assault conducted to surpress free speech. Both the assault and attempt to surpress free speech were wrong-- irrespective of the minutemen's message. We don't discuss the message because it is irrelevant in this context. (Advice to those who want to discuss the minutemen's message: discuss it!)
Sure many people are inclined to supress free speech, some, like the protestors at Columbia actually do so. Sure, police protection would be required if the KKK chose to protest in Central LA. That's why competent administrators and elected officials arrange the police protection often at the city's cost. When administrators and authorities fail to forsee these mini-riots, they try to identify those who committed crimes, arrest and punish them. (If the administrators don't do any of these things, the are criticized and often booted out of their jobs or political offices.)
Few buy the argument, "Well, the people who were assaulted might, hypothetically, have done the same under other circumstances. So, it's all right then."
Libertarians may wish for a small government that does as little as necessary to permit smooth functioning of society, but I don't think they want it quite that small! ( I think the term for those who want zero government is anarchists?)
Yes... I'm sure that wouldn't look silly.
That makes me think of the old internet favorite involving "I put on my wizard cap and robe..."
Stewart has been making fun of both parties for years. The goal of his show is comedy, and lord knows both sides do plenty of things that are ripe for satire or jokes. Doesn't really even matter who the host is either, they made fun of everyone when Kilborn hosted it too.
What is racist about opposing illegal immigration? What is wrong with wanting our immigration laws to be enforced? What is wrong with not wanting an uncontrolled flow of people over our border? What were the racist beliefs that Gilcrist was spouting? What book by Buchanon are you refering to? Where's the evidence in your argument?
If the Columbia protesters had just sat in the audience (apparently, they took up more than a few of the seats) and remained quiet, this would not have become a cause celebre among the wingnuts. One might almost wonder if the wingnust paid them to make a scene.