Foundation Press will be putting out the third edition of my Academic Legal Writing book in Fall 2007. I have some ideas of my own for improving the book, but I'd love to get suggestions from readers (and others). Hence, a few questions:
What would it be good for the book to cover that it doesn't already cover?
What does the book already cover that it should cover in more detail?
What does the book say that you think it should stress more?
What does the book say that you think is wrong or counterproductive?
I'd love to see your input on this. Thanks!