There's a petition circulating in Massachusetts to define marriage as the union of husband and wife in the state constitution. In a bid to discourage anyone from signing the petition, a couple of activists have posted the petition names on the internet.
A friend pointed out to me the following post from Livejournal.com: http://www.livejournal.com/users/mmeubiquitous/119651.html?thread=253795#t253795
"You do realize, I hope, that the names and addresses of all the signatories will be posted on the web, since it's a matter of public record... if you signed, don't be surprised if it has reprocussions (sic) in your future. I, for example, am professionally a manager, and from time to time I do hiring. I will most certainly be vetting all applicants against the list of petitioners in the future to ensure I don't hire anyone who signed, because I wouldn't be able to trust them to behave professionally toward gay coworkers. . ."
No doubt it is mostly hot air. Still, does this whole thing give anyone else the creeps? Can anyone explain why?
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- The Marriage Debate and ReproTech:
- Maggie Answer on Marriage, P.S.
- Answer from Maggie About Marriage:...
- The Legal Marriage Debate:
- Marriage Debate Digression:
- The Marriage Debate, Round 3 (or 4, but who’s counting?):...
- The Marriage Debate
- The Marriage Debate:
- Maggie Gallagher Guest-Blogging About Same-Sex Marriage: