[Puzzleblogger Kevan Choset, September 23, 2005 at 12:03pm] Trackbacks
What do these actors

have in common?

F. Murray Abraham, Holly Hunter, Adrien Brody, Jamie Foxx.

Name another actor that has the same characteristic. I have one answer in mind, though there may be others.

Nobody Special:
Didn't they all win an Oscar for playing a character who was a pianist?

I'm extremely indifferent to academy awards, so I'll fail the second half there.
9.23.2005 1:07pm
H-Bomb (mail):
Geoffrey Rush, then.
9.23.2005 1:17pm
Cliff Claven:
Who are four people who have never been in my kitchen?
9.23.2005 1:24pm
Cheburashka (mail):
Four people who make very boring movies.

Four actors who aren't Jewish.
9.23.2005 1:35pm
Howard (mail):
Could've sworn that Jamie Foxx was Jewish...
9.23.2005 1:52pm
DJ (mail):
Four academy award actors who share the name of famous wrestlers? (a) "Hunter" Hearst Helmsley, (b) King Kong "Brody", (c) Stone Cold "Murray" Austin, (d) The Big Red "Foxx" Machine.
9.23.2005 1:53pm
Andy (mail) (www):
Jack Nicholson played a pianist in "Five Easy Pieces" and was nominated for an Oscar, but didn't win. He subsequently won for "One Flew Over...". Does he at least sort-of fit in this definition?
9.23.2005 2:30pm
Scipio (mail) (www):
Four Academy Award winners whose work has sucked ever since they won the Oscar?

There's a lot more on that list, too.
9.23.2005 2:46pm
Alex Trebek:
Who are four people who have never been in my kitchen?

Darn it, you beat me to it!
9.23.2005 2:47pm
Hoya:
I don't think that Salieri, whom F Murray Abraham portayed in Amadeus, played the piano. I think Salieri was violin and harpsichord.
9.23.2005 4:08pm
Michael Zimmer (mail) (www):
" think Salieri was violin and harpsichord."

won an Oscar for playing a character who played a keyboard instrument, then...
9.23.2005 4:46pm
Matt Barr (mail) (www):
I think it's just musicians.

A similar and more ribald question might be what Elizabeth Taylor, Janet Gaynor, Mira Sorvino and Shirley Jones have in common.
9.23.2005 5:06pm
Cheburashka (mail):

Four Academy Award winners whose work has sucked ever since they won the Oscar?


Holly Hunter was really good in The Incredibles.

But I still say that these are for people who act, aren't Jewish, and have never been in Cliff's kitchen. What are the probabilities of any four people meeting that description!
9.23.2005 5:49pm
Goober (mail):
F. Murray Abraham isn't Jewish?
9.23.2005 6:15pm
fling93 (www):
None of them are Natalie Portman?
9.23.2005 8:08pm
DonBoy (mail) (www):
9.23.2005 8:48pm
Norm Conquest (mail):
Adrien Brody isn't Jewish?
9.23.2005 9:39pm
arbitraryaardvark (mail) (www):
David Byrne won an Oscar involving keyboard work in Last Emperor, but is he an actor? Yankee Doodle Dandy won an Oscar, who played George Cohen, and does that fit whatever it is we're looking for? Rush was the best answer so far. Has Elton John acted, and did he win something for Lion King? I'm probably off track.
9.23.2005 11:18pm
Pejman Yousefzadeh (mail) (www):
Perhaps it is sufficient to say that they all played musicians in the movies.

Nah, too easy.
9.24.2005 12:33am
Ken Lammers (mail) (www):
They are all within 6 degrees of Kevin Bacon:

F. Murray Abraham was in Looking for Richard (1996) with Aidan (I) Quinn
Aidan (I) Quinn was in Cavedweller (2004) with Kevin Bacon

Holly Hunter was in End of the Line (1988) with Kevin Bacon

Adrien Brody was in Liberty Heights (1999) with Paul Majors
Paul Majors was in Woodsman, The (2004) with Kevin Bacon

Jamie Foxx was in Bait (2000) with Billy Otis
Billy Otis was in Cavedweller (2004) with Kevin Bacon

And another actor within the 6 degrees would be Charley Chaplin:

Charles Chaplin was in Limelight (1952) with Norman Lloyd
Norman Lloyd was in Adventures of Rocky &Bullwinkle, The (2000) with David Alan Grier
David Alan Grier was in Woodsman, The (2004) with Kevin Bacon
9.24.2005 3:40pm
Pejman Yousefzadeh (mail) (www):
Tom Hulce would be another actor. As would Val Kilmer.
9.25.2005 12:43am
Silicon Valley Jim:
I don't think that Salieri, whom F Murray Abraham portayed in Amadeus, played the piano. I think Salieri was violin and harpsichord.

There is at least one recording of "The Two Piano Concertos" by Salieri, although it's possible that they were actually written for some other keyboard instrument and are just being played on the harpsichord. Salieri was born in 1750, which is after the first appearance of an instrument that we would recognize today as a piano (1709 is the usual date given). Mozart was born in 1756, and his piano concerti are definitely for piano, although a somewhat different instrument from today's piano (only 64 keys, for one thing).
9.25.2005 11:03pm
Edward A. Hoffman (mail):
The fact that Salieri wrote piano concertos doesn't mean he actually played the piano. He wrote entire operas and symphonies, after all, and this logic would suggest that he could sing and play every instrument.

Most composers are able to play the piano to some degree if only to hear how their compositions are shaping up, but the ability required for that type of work is a far cry from what it takes to perform in front of an audience. The large majority of composers are surely content with their own keyboard talents, whatever they may be. The rest, I suppose, just suffer from pianist envy.
9.26.2005 5:33pm
Silicon Valley Jim:
The fact that Salieri wrote piano concertos doesn't mean he actually played the piano. He wrote entire operas and symphonies, after all, and this logic would suggest that he could sing and play every instrument.

That's true as far as it goes, but it lacks some context. In Mozart and Salieri's time (and certainly through Beethoven's time, as well), composers wrote concerti primarily to perform them themselves; H.C. Robbins Landon, perhaps the world's pre-eminent Haydn scholar, has written that Haydn's relative lack of skill as a performer is the reason that he wrote so few concerti. There are exceptions, of course; Mozart wrote an astonishingly great clarinet concerto, several horn concerti, etc., but he wrote his piano concerti (all twenty-seven of them) to perform himself (with the exception, of course, of No. 10, which is for two pianos).

Also, playing the piano, while it differs somewhat from playing the harpsichord, really doesn't differ as much as, say, playing the oboe does. It's more like oboe vs. English horn. The differences between an eighteenth-century piano and a harpsichord would have been smaller than the differences between today's piano and a harpsichord.
9.26.2005 11:29pm