Romer, recall, is the case in which Judge Roberts -- then a partner in Hogan & Hartson -- helped out the gay rights side by participating in a moot court for their Supreme Court argument, apparently because a partner at his firm was involved in the case and wanted Roberts' help. People wonder whether you can tell much from this incident about what Roberts thinks about the underlying issue. I think the answer is "no," and here's a quote that I think helpfully explains why:
"John was building an appellate practice at our firm. And he wanted to be able to have the freedom to bring cases into the firm that were of interest to him. John therefore was open to being helpful to other partners and their clients. Pretty standard for a big law firm practice."
-- Mr. David Leitch, Former Partner with John Roberts at Hogan & Hartson (1987-1990, 1993-2001).
Seems to me that this is precisely how lawyers at big firms -- especially lawyers with Roberts' reputation for affability and collegiality -- operate. I got the quote from a Republican source, but I have no reason to doubt the quote's genuineness.
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
- Were the votes of Justices Ginsburg and Breyer in NOW v. Scheidler
- Many John Roberts-Related Documents --
- NARAL Pulls Anti-Roberts Ad,...
- FactCheck.Org Comes to John Roberts' Defense,
- John Roberts, Collegiality, and the Romer v. Evans Moot Court:
- NARAL Advertisement:...
- Have You Ever Been a Member of the Federalist Society?
- Is Roberts a Fellow Traveler?:
- John Roberts Does Not Belong To The Federalist Society: